Anti-Gambling Bills Advance Through Both Houses of U.S. Legislature
From the Financial Times:
The House judiciary committee on Thursday approved legislation that would in effect outlaw most forms of internet gambling by barring US banks from processing financial transactions involving online gaming. It was the latest in an effort dating back to 1995, when the first online gambling site was launched. So far it has come up short, but that has failed to deter its supporters. The legislation is likely to be passed by the House of Representatives next month, though so far there is no movement on a companion Senate bill and the prospects for approval this year appear slim.
Thankfully, attempts to deal with internet gambling in the recent past have failed, but that doesn't mean the current bills will fail like their predecessors. And the reason for the current legislation?
According to the Justice Department’s interpretation, Americans are already barred from gambling online by a 1961 law that prohibits betting over telephone lines. But prosecutions under the law have been rare, and the courts have been divided over the whether the 1961 law applies to the internet. The proposed congressional legislation would make this clear by barring US banks from processing financial transactions related to most forms of online gambling.
Oh, spectacular. And what about the supporters of these bills?
The issue has thrown up odd coalitions in Washington. Most of the push has come from a variety of Christian conservative groups. They are opposed to all forms of gambling but in particular they are concerned that it has come right into American homes through computers, where it may be easily accessible to children.
Robert Goodlatte, the Republican author of the latest legislation, says online gambling sites, which operate from the Caribbean and other offshore locations, “suck billions of dollars per year out of the US economy, serve as a vehicle for money laundering, undermine families and threaten the ability of states to enact and enforce their own laws”.
So, that's really all it comes down to, tax money and legislating morality.
While previous attempts at legislating morality have failed (just look at alcohol and current gambling laws), I don't expect the Christian Right to ever give up easily in the face of reality. Gambling has been a fixture of American life since the founding of the colonies, in the form of lotteries, card games, dice games, horse racing, you name it, and the popularity of gambling ensures that outlawing gaming will only create a large group of citizen criminals. All attempts to outlaw so-called vices have failed, and in many cases the cure is simply worse than the malady. The prohibitionists fail to understand that forcing gaming out of the legal limelight and into the back alleys of the internet will only have negative consequences, creating numerous opportunities for organized crime and dishonest businesses to excel.
As for Representative Goodlatte's worries about losing money from the US economy and opening avenues for money laundering, he has only himself and the federal government to blame for those problems, not to mention the myriad anti-gaming laws passed by the various state governments. The companies incorporated in off-shore countries due to anti-gaming laws passed by the states and by Congress, so it's not as if the businesses had much of a choice in whether or not to incorporate in the United States. Forcing the companies to incorporate in foreign countries with lax financial laws, as with many countries in the Caribbean, has also created the problem of laundering money through the businesses. The real solution to both problems, i.e. criminal activity and loss of tax money, would be to repeal the current laws in the US banning online gaming. Fat chance of that happening, though.
After all that, still thinking about playing online games on the sly? Well, if you live in Washington state, be wary. From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:
Beginning next month, Washington residents who play poker or make other types of wagers on the Internet will be committing a Class C felony, equivalent under the law to possessing child pornography, threatening the governor or torturing an animal.
Although the head of the state Gambling Commission says it is unlikely that individual online gamblers will be targeted for arrest, the new law carries stiff penalties: as much as five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Five years in prison for gambling over the internet? How the hell is that justified? I can get less for repeated DUI convictions, assault and battery, burglary...c'mon. Sounds like a bunch of overzealous legislators, yet again.
The Washington law, which upgrades online gambling from a misdemeanor, was an effort to be compatible with federal law, said state Sen. Margarita Prentice, D-Renton.
The law applies to all online gambling.
Gambling Commission Director Rick Day and Prentice, who sponsored the legislation, said the law is necessary, partly to protect the gamblers themselves.
Pull the other one, Mr. Day, it's got bells on. How will a felony conviction protect gamblers, other than ensuring that jailed citizens won't be able to gamble online?
Day said the intent of the new law is not to give agents greater incentive to track online gamblers and throw them in prison. Jailing small-time online gamblers is "not the focus of our work," he said.
But he confirmed that commission agents had gone to the homes of several state gamblers (fewer than half a dozen, he said) about a year ago to warn them that such activity was illegal. No one was arrested.
In fact, no one has ever been prosecuted in Washington -- or anywhere nationally, according to gambling publications -- strictly for gambling online.
Sure, they haven't arrested anyone, yet, but they made it clear they know who's been gambling online. Don't the Washington government and various police forces have anything better to do than go after a bunch of people playing poker from their living rooms?
As for the bills themselves, here are the links (if the links fail, just go here and find the bills either by their number or by their sponsor):
-HR 4411, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, sponsored by Rep. James Leach (Iowa)
-HR 4777, Internet Gambling Prohibition Act, sponsored by Rep. Robert Goodlatte
-S.AMDT.1718, an amendment to HR 2862, sponsored by Sen. Kyl
Internet Gambling, Online Gambling